A Denmark-based man has been found guilty of uploading nude scenes from protected movies and television shows on the social media platform Reddit.
According to a police report obtained by BBC News, the anonymous man shared 347 clips of explicit content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million times.
The country's authorities state he has been given a seven-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.
Legal analysts say the man was charged under a rarely-used provision in Danish copyright law, with the judge finding that by removing the scenes out of their intended setting, the man had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".
He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted data.
From spring 2022 to May 2023, the user known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips including over 100 actresses.
He distributed them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.
According to the Danish anti-piracy organization the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and users were encouraged to ask for excerpts of specific performers.
In 2023, campaigners reported the incident to the police on behalf of the affected actors, filmmakers and producers, which led to the forum being closed down.
One actress, one of the performers whose nude scenes were shared in the group, explained to local broadcasters at the time she believed there was a distinction between appearing naked in a movie and appearing on Reddit.
The actress said the posts constituted "abuse".
The man was arrested in September 2024 and admitted guilty to the charges recently.
In a comment following the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund remarked the outcome sent an "important" signal "indicating infringements of artists' entitlements have repercussions".
The verdict is viewed as unique in the country for its use of the "moral rights" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an creator's work cannot be used in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.
Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova informed the media the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the integrity of an performer, rather than to them economically.
How the ruling could influence nations abroad is uncertain.
But she added there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of one's work might be compromised much more easily".
A financial analyst with over a decade of experience in trading and market research, specializing in technical analysis and risk management.